Legal Opinion

Corbishley v. Gribben

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 75PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This is an action of ejectment, involving the north boundary line of lot 25 of the plat of A. W. Hand’s survey of the village of Port Sanilac. Plaintiff owns lot 25 and claims the north line thereof has been fixed by adverse possession for 50 years and includes the strip of land in suit. Defendant owns lot 26, which lies next to lot 25, denies the possession asserted by plaintiff and insists that under his deed from the State, of title derived by the State in tax proceedings, the lot lines as platted control and any other line, even though established by adverse possession, cannot be invoked.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Foster v. WagenaarMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API