Legal Opinion

Caruso v. Caruso

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 5, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kalisch, J.

The basic fact which led to litigation in the courts of this state, was a contract, entered into, and to be performed in this state, by the famous tenor, Enrico Caruso, in his lifetime, with the Yictor Talking Machine Company, a corporation of this state, whereby it agreed to pay a royalty of ten per cent, on all sales of the Caruso singing records, for an indefinite period of time, and under which contract, the Yictor com pany had already paid royalties after Caruso’s death, for the years 1921 and 1922, amounting to more than $500,000, to…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chaudry v. ChaudryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. Matter of Estate of GilliesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  3. In Re AveryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  4. In Re the Estate of RocheSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  5. In Re UnglaubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API