Legal Opinion
Daniel v. Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 20, 1994No. 11792PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The defendants appeal from the trial court’s decision sustaining the plaintiffs’ appeal from the decision of the Norwalk zoning commission. The defendants1 claim that the trial court (1) improperly-concluded that the plaintiffs’ due process rights were violated by the defendant zoning commission’s receipt of evidence after the public hearing, (2) improperly substituted its judgment for that of the zoning commission, (3) improperly based its judgment on inconsistent conclusions, and (4) failed to recognize that it was bound by collateral estoppel to adhere to its previous holding in a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blaker v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Norooz v. Inland Wetlands AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Megin v. ZONING BD. OF APP. OF NEW MILFORDConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Boris v. Garbo Lobster Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Villages, LLC v. Enfield Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Suburban Builders, Inc. v. City of New London, No. 543367 (Apr. 23, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999