Legal Opinion

Guhl v. Pinkard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 24, 1979No. 34357, 34358PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

In this zoning case, the trial court declared the single family residential (R-100) zoning on the property owners’ land unconstitutional and remanded the case to the county commissioners, who rezoned the property for multi-family residential uses (R-A5). The property owners had sought office and commercial zoning. The trial court then also declared the R-A5 zoning unconstitutional. The commissioners appeal both rulings. We affirm in Case No. 34358 involving the R-100 zoning and reverse in Case No. 34357 regarding the R-A5 zoning.

In Guhl v. Davis, 242 Ga. 356…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barrett v. HambySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Guhl v. Holcomb Bridge Road Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Bentley v. ChastainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Olley Valley Estates, Inc. v. FussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  5. Guhl v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gwinnett County v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. DeKalb County v. FlynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. DeKalb County v. BrembySupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  4. Board of Zoning Adjustment v. Fulton Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API