Guhl v. Pinkard
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Undercofler, Presiding Justice.
In this zoning case, the trial court declared the single family residential (R-100) zoning on the property owners’ land unconstitutional and remanded the case to the county commissioners, who rezoned the property for multi-family residential uses (R-A5). The property owners had sought office and commercial zoning. The trial court then also declared the R-A5 zoning unconstitutional. The commissioners appeal both rulings. We affirm in Case No. 34358 involving the R-100 zoning and reverse in Case No. 34357 regarding the R-A5 zoning.
In Guhl v. Davis, 242 Ga. 356…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barrett v. HambySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Guhl v. Holcomb Bridge Road Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Bentley v. ChastainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Olley Valley Estates, Inc. v. FussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Guhl v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gwinnett County v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- DeKalb County v. FlynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- DeKalb County v. BrembySupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Board of Zoning Adjustment v. Fulton Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.