Legal Opinion

Eastern Elevator, Inc. v. Page

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 18, 1971No. Nos. 70-930, 70-937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court entered its order denying motions which sought dismissal for lack of prosecution. Defendants timely filed two separate petitions for writ of certiorari seeking review of such order. These separate petitions have been consolidated for briefing, oral argument and disposition.

An order denying dismissal for lack of prosecution is an interlocutory order which may be reviewed by interlocutory appeal. Rule 4.2, F.A.R. 32 F.S.A. The rule does not preclude a party from applying to the court for the discretionary writ of certiorari to review such interlocutory order. In the instant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Owens v. Ken's Paint and Body ShopDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  2. Rosenfeld v. GlicksteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. Cypress Corporation of Florida v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Fund Insurance Companies v. PreskittDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  5. Musselman Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. RadziwonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eastern Elevator, Inc. v. PageSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  2. Bowl America Florida, Inc. v. SchmidtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Musselman Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. RadziwonSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. Crouse-Hinds Company v. CapelliaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Musselman Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. RadziwonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API