Ingle v. Landis Tool Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
In Equity. Patent infringement suit by Arthur PI. Ingle against the Landis Tool Company and the Gurney Electric Elevator Company.
1Opinion of the Court
WITMER, District Judge.
In tills infringement suit, the sole question at issue is one of title or ownership of the improvements in a boring machine, forming tlie basis of this controversy, and covered by letters patent, on application of William R. Carey, No. 1,244,449.
It appears that the Ingle Machine Company was organized in 1904 Having purchased from Conrad M. Conradson the right to manufacture a horizontal boring, machine which he had invented, together with assignments lor patents, the company began the building and sale of these machines. The machines were improved through the efforts of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Ager v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Dowse v. Federal Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1918
- Kuhn v. GuildCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peck v. Standard Parts Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- M. J. Lewis Products Co. v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1931
- Selden Co. v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1930
- Ingle v. Landis Tool Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1928