Legal Opinion
Griffin v. Sebek
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1976No. File 11623Published
1Opinion of the Court
245 N.W.2d 481 (1976)
Robert James GRIFFIN and Raymond Griffin, Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
Roland SEBEK and Mary Ann Sebek, Individually and doing business as Sebek's Tavern, Defendants and Respondents.
No. 11623.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
September 15, 1976.
Richardson, Groseclose, Kornmann & Wyly, Aberdeen, Conmy, Feste & Bossart, Ltd., Fargo, N. D., for plaintiffs and appellants.
Holland & Brantseg, Sisseton, for defendants and respondents.
COLER, Justice.
Appellants, the son and his father, respectively, commenced this action for damages based upon the theory of negligence of respondents,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Elder v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
- Adamian v. Three Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Mary Ann Waynick v. Chicago's Last Department Store, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Hoekstra v. HelgelandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.