Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jones v. . Warehouse Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1DissentMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff alleges that he was in the employment of the defendant company in its finishing mill near the town of Spray, N.C. That he was directed by the defendant's superintendent to work at a machine known as a "napper." That there was attached to said machine a large pulley run by belting connecting with the shafting overhead. On the inner or lower side of the machine was a smaller pulley which drove a fan or other part of the machinery and is run by a smaller belt. This smaller pulley is not grooved, and the belt at times slips and has to be replaced by the operator. Defendant's…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bost v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. Perry v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Rosemary Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Apel v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Stewart Dry Goods Co. v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API