Legal Opinion

Pignatelli v. Pignatelli

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernstein, J.

The petitioner is seeking, under the provisions of section 964 of the Penal Law, to restrain the respondents from using the title or designation of “ Prince ” or “ Princess ” Pignatelli. Since there is a motion presently pending and undetermined before another justice of this court to set aside the service of the order to show cause herein as to the respondents Guido Pignatelli and Henrietta Hartford, the application here affects only the respondent Constance Wilcox Pignatelli, who is the wife of the respondent Guido Pignatelli.

The petitioner claims that he was born a prince and has been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brennan v. MahoneyNew York Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Association of Contracting Plumbers of the City of New York, Inc. v. Contracting Plumbers Ass'n of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Agash Refining Corp. v. Abraham GashNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Schenne v. BensonNew York Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API