Legal Opinion

Barrett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 18, 1991No. 89-2704PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHIVERS, Chief Judge.

The appellant/defendant appeals his conviction and sentence of grand theft, raising three arguments: (1) that the trial court erroneously denied his motion for mistrial; (2) that the written probation order fails to conform to the trial court’s oral pronounce*185ment with regard to probationary term and amount of restitution; and (3) that the trial court erred in delegating the determination of amount of restitution to appellant’s probation officer.

We affirm the first issue, finding that the comment made by the prosecutor in the instant case, even if erroneous, was not so…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Buenoano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Brammer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ashe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API