Legal Opinion

Takach v. Williams Homes, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1983No. 82-1399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.

Appellant presents this court with the following proposition of law.

“Revised Code § 1311.011 does not require a construction lender to protect the interests of a non-borrower while disbursing a borrower’s loan funds.”

Two loan contracts were made in this case. Appellant made a commitment to appellees for a purchase money mortgage plan and also a construction loan to Williams Homes. There is no dispute that appellant properly disbursed the mortgage loan funds. Similarly, there is no question that appellant improperly disbursed the construction loan funds, since it did not comply with the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson Electric, Inc. v. Bank OneOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Wooten v. Republic Savings BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Blanchester Lumber & Supply, Inc. v. Cardinal State BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API