Chase v. Putnam
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County. Joseph P. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
Action in claim and delivery to recover three horses or their value.. Defendant set up two defenses to the action: 1. Denial of most of the material allegations of the complaint; 2. That the three horses, with four others owned by plaintiff, were found damage feasant upon his premises; were impounded, notice given to plaintiff, damages assessed, property sold by constable and purchased by defendant, substantially as pro*365vided by statute of March 27,1872, entitled, “An act to protect agriculture and to prevent the trespassing of animals upon private property.”
The cause was tried by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lehmann v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Williams v. AsheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Curran v. Shattuck.California Supreme Court · 1864
- Trumpler v. BemerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Sutton v. StephanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cook v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- McCarty v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Diamond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Newland v. HattenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Peerless Insurance & Brokerage Co. v. Dwyer Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.