Legal Opinion
State v. Mayes, 88426 (5-17-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 17, 2007No. 88426PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant, Peter William Mayes, appeals from the decision of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas that denied his motion for summary judgment on his motion for modification of sentence.1 For the reasons stated herein, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
{¶ 2} In 2003, Mayes was convicted and sentenced on two counts of attempted rape, one count of rape, and one count of gross sexual imposition, all involving a minor girl. Mayes filed a direct appeal challenging his conviction. This court affirmed the conviction inState v. Mayes, Cuyahoga App. No.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MeinckeOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. MayesOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. MayesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014