Legal Opinion

Pindar v. Parke Davis & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold J. Hughes, J.

This is a motion by plaintiff to compel disclosure by defendant Roy Gr. S. Dougall.

The complaint herein seeks to recover for the personal injury and pain and suffering sustained by Patricia J. Pindar, now deceased, and also for her wrongful death, allegedly caused by the negligence of defendant Dougall and the negligence and breach of warranty of defendant Parke Davis and Company.

Dr. Dougall was examined before trial on February 24, 1972 at which time he refused to answer certain questions about a presentation he had made to a combined meeting of the Schoharie County Medical Association and…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Swartzenberg v. TrivediAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Silva v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Burnside v. Foot ClinicsNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  4. De Lucco v. DavidsonNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Romero v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API