Legal Opinion
Decicco v. John Morrell & Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided November 9, 1940No. 34,906PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoch, J.:
This is a workman’s compensation case. The appeal presents only one question. We are asked to reverse the trial court and support the compensation commissioner in interpretation and application of the language “the loss of the first phalange of . . . *602any finger” as found in the workman’s compensation act (G. S. 1935, 44-510, ¶ 3 [6.]).
On September 12, 1939, the appellant, Joseph Decicco, an employee of John Morrell and Company, suffered an injury to the index finger of his left hand when it was caught in a refrigerator door closed by another…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Claims of PetrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Claim of Forbes v. Evening MailAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Claim of Geiger v. Gotham Can Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Claim of Mockler v. HawkesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Claim of Tetro v. Superior Printing & Box Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tovrea Packing Co. v. TapiaArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Landry v. Graphic Technology, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Holstein v. State Compensation DirectorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
- Vossbruch v. Reiner Electronics Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1959