Legal Opinion

Celio v. Jones

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1941No. 13PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, District Judge.

General Admiralty Rule 2 provides that: “In suits in personam the mesne process shall be by a simple monition in the nature of a summons to appear and answer to the suit * * * with a clause therein to attach his [respondent’s] goods and chattels * * * if said respondent shall hot be found within the district. * * * ” 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723.

The instant case presents the simple question: What does “found” mean as used in Rule 2?

On February 26, 1941, the libellant Celio, a resident of Brooklyn, N. Y., filed a libel in personam and in rem against the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atkins v. Disintegrating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. American Potato Corp. v. Boca Grande S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Shewan v. HallenbeckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1906
  4. The AthanasiosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The ValmarDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API