Celio v. Jones
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, District Judge.
General Admiralty Rule 2 provides that: “In suits in personam the mesne process shall be by a simple monition in the nature of a summons to appear and answer to the suit * * * with a clause therein to attach his [respondent’s] goods and chattels * * * if said respondent shall hot be found within the district. * * * ” 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723.
The instant case presents the simple question: What does “found” mean as used in Rule 2?
On February 26, 1941, the libellant Celio, a resident of Brooklyn, N. Y., filed a libel in personam and in rem against the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Atkins v. Disintegrating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- American Potato Corp. v. Boca Grande S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1916
- Shewan v. HallenbeckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1906
- The AthanasiosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1915
3Cited by1 opinion
- The ValmarDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941