Eady v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Affirmed. See Cox v. State, 221 So.3d 723, 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (holding: "Unlike a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to rule 3.800(a) places the burden upon the defendant ... to affirmatively identify court records which, on their face, demonstrate the existence of an illegal sentence or an entitlement to relief under rule 3.800(a)"); Llerena v. State, 953 So.2d 31, 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (noting: "Concurrent sentences do not necessarily begin at the same time, and unless they are ordered to be coterminous, they will…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Llerena v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Knight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002