Home Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. Alabama Utilities Service Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The suit is in detinue to recover one “Bryant” gas furnace with thermostat. The suit was originally against one Sharrer who filed a disclaimer and suggested the Home Bond & Mortgage Corporation, from whom he had leased the house in which the furnace had ■been placed, as the interested party,' and said corporation was thereupon duly substituted as defendant. The cause was tried before the court without a jury and on oral proof, resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff, from which defendant prosecutes this appeal.
The defendant first insists the furnace was a fixture and a part of the realty; a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Figh v. TaberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Street v. TreadwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Nelson v. HowisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Daniel Bros. v. Jordan & SonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Moore v. Monroe Refrigerator Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. Dan River Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Roberts v. GraysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Mars, Inc. v. ChubriloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934