Legal Opinion

Irby v. Southern Ry.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 26, 1912No. 8324PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Wilson, J., Richland, November term, 1911. Action by Amanda Irby against Southern Railway Company and W. M. Davis. Defendants appeal. cites: As to admission of city ordinances: 62 S. C. 327; 72 S. C. .3; 47 S. C. 28. One on track is presumed to get out of way of lever car: 70 S. C. 194.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

This was an action for damages brought by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendants-appellants for personal injuries received by the plaintiff at a public street crossing in the city of Columbia. It seems that at the place of the injury several railroad tracks cross the street quite near each other. Some of these tracks, belong to the Columbia, Newberry and Laurens Railroad and some to the defendant company. When the plaintiff arrived, she found the street blocked by a passing train on the Columbia, Newberry and Laurens road…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Priester v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Cole v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  3. Stabler v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API