Legal Opinion

Francis W. King Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Geiger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the *879amended complaint. The amended complaint alleges the necessary elements of a cause of action under article 10 of the Debtor and Creditor Law (see, Prometheus Books v Russica Book & Art Shop, 105 AD2d 1138, 1140; Loblaw, Inc. v Wylie, 50 AD2d 4, 7) and alleges fraud in sufficient detail to satisfy the requirement of CPLR 3016 (b) (see, Moore Adv. Agency v Shapiro, 124 AD2d 696). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, Jr., J.—Amend Complaint.)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loblaw, Inc. v. WylieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Ed Moore Advertising Agency, Inc. v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Prometheus Books v. Russica Book & Art Shop, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API