Orr v. Schack
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FARMER, Judge.
The trial judge1 denied a motion seeking to recuse him from presiding over petitioner Petito’s criminal trial because the judge had filed a grievance against the petitioner’s lawyer charging him with witness tampering. In his order denying the motion on the grounds that it was legally insufficient, the judge explained: “Attorneys are required [e.o.] by Rule 4-8.3 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar to report suspected misconduct of a fellow attorney to the Florida Bar.”2
We did not require a response from the State because we have Judge Schack’s five page order setting forth…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Livingston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Bundy v. RuddSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- City of Jacksonville v. RaulersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982