Legal Opinion

Orr v. Schack

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 3, 1991No. 91-1137Published

1Opinion of the Court

FARMER, Judge.

The trial judge1 denied a motion seeking to recuse him from presiding over petitioner Petito’s criminal trial because the judge had filed a grievance against the petitioner’s lawyer charging him with witness tampering. In his order denying the motion on the grounds that it was legally insufficient, the judge explained: “Attorneys are required [e.o.] by Rule 4-8.3 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar to report suspected misconduct of a fellow attorney to the Florida Bar.”2

We did not require a response from the State because we have Judge Schack’s five page order setting forth…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Livingston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Bundy v. RuddSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  4. City of Jacksonville v. RaulersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API