Legal Opinion

Young v. Vermillion

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 13, 1999No. 92,560PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

CAROL M. HANSEN, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 We granted rehearing in this decision upon a request by Appellees to allow briefing based on a finding the appeal was not an appeal submitted pursuant to the procedures for the appellate accelerated docket, rule 1.203, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 12 O.S.1991 Ch. 15, App. 2. This Court ordered the parties to file briefs in accordance with Okla.Sup.Ct.Rule 1.10(a).

¶ 2 This lawsuit involves interpretation of a reservation in a quitclaim deed of an undivided one-half interest in the oil and gas and other minerals underlying a certain…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Bonebrake v. McNeillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Bryan v. EverettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Manson v. MageeMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Murphy v. AthansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Combs v. ShermanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. MacDonald Oil & Gas, LLC v. SleddCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API