Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Cool

California Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1901No. S.F. No. 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

This is an action to have a deed, absolute on its face, declared to be a mortgage, and to foreclose the same. It appears from the findings, which are supported by the evi dence, that plaintiff, in 1897, was a money-lender in San Francisco, and that the defendant J. F. Turner was indebted to him in the sum of seven hundred dollars, for which plaintiff held two promissory notes executed by said Turner, and certain collaterals as security. Plaintiff was dissatisfied with his security, and Turner desired more money. Turner then, as plaintiff testified, suggested that he owned a tract of land…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. People v. ArgentosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Keele v. ClouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Jeannerette v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Pease v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API