Legal Opinion

Howell v. Sanders

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided June 17, 2010No. 6:04-misc-00005PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BERTELSMAN, District Judge:

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment (Doc. 7). The court heard oral argument on this motion on June 2, 2010, after which it took the motion under advisement. (Doc. 18)

Having heard the parties, and having further reviewed this matter, the court now issues the following Opinion and Order.

Introduction

As explained in the following opinion, this court believes that well-settled principles of law require the court to conclude that the defendant prosecutor in this case is…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nicole Howell v. Rob SandersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Carroll v. YoungDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023
  3. Henderson v. ConradDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
  4. James Ira Samples et al. v. Carrie Ovey-Wiggins et al.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025
  5. Nicole Howell v. Rob SandersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API