Mary Hicks Semon v. Royal Indemnity Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge.
Presented here is the question whether one chartering a fishing vessel to fishing parties is engaged in the operation of a public vessel as a common carrier of passengers. The District Court on summary judgment gave a negative answer. 179 F.Supp. 403. We affirm.
The issue arises under an insurance policy issued by the Insurer to Semon, the decedent. The principal sum of $20,-000 was payable upon the occurrence of the Insured’s death by accidental means. This was paid as it was conceded that Semon’s death while a passenger on the M/V Sportsman was accidental. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lloyd v. HaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Cushing v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Dunn v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- McBride v. McNallySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Circle Express Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- National Ass'n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Computer & Communications Industry Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- National Ass'n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Computer and Communications Industry Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, North American Telephone Association, Utilities Telecommunications Council, Tymnet, Inc., Continental Telephone Corporation, Xerox Corporation, Hazeltine Corporation, Alarm Industry Telecommunications Committee of the National Burglar & Fire Alarm Association, Rca Global Communications, Inc., Satellite Business Systems, Motorola, Inc., U.S. Telephone & Telegraph Corporation, American Petroleum Institute, Citicorp, Central Telephone & Utilities Corporation, Comsat General Corporation, American Newspaper Publishers Association, Gte Service Corporation, Sperry Univac Division of Sperry Corporation, Communications Satellite Corporation, International Business MacHines Corporation, American Telephone & Telegraph Company, Computer & Business Equipment Manufacturers Association, Control Data Corporation, United Telephone System, Inc., United Computing Systems, Inc., Southern Pacific Communications Company, Western Union Telegraph Company, Aeronautical Radio, Inc., Isa Communications Services, Inc., Independent Data Communications Manufacturers Association, Inc., Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc., Bunker Ramo Corporation, Gte Telenet Communications Corporation, Municipality of Anchorage D/B/A Anchorage Telephone Utility, Louisiana Public Service Commission, Intervenors. The People of the State of California and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, International Business MacHines Corp., Intervenors. Independent Data Communications Manufacturers Association, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, International Business MacHines Corp., Intervenors. National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, International Business MacHines Corp., Intervenors. American Newspaper Publishers Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, International Business MacHines Corp., Intervenors. Motorola, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, International Business MacHines Corp., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Florida Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.