Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Davis

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 11, 1883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Floyd District Ooúrt. This is an action to foreclose a mortgage. There was a demurrer to the petition, which was overruled. The defendant failed to answer, and a decree was entered against them as prayed in the petition. ' Defendants appeal.'

1Opinion of the CourtRothbook, J.

l. judgment: aer tho°stat-" not.:wlmtls — I. ‘ It appears from- the averments of the petition that on the fifteenth day of April, 187 6, the defendants, Cynthia Davis and Edward Davis, executed and delivered'to one Logan, the assignor of plain t- ' iffs, a promissory note for $1,000 and interest; and that, to secure the payment of said note, the said defendants executed and delivered to Logan a mortgage upon certain real estate. The note and mortgage were duly assigned by-Logan to the plaintiffs, and on the fifteenth day of August, 1881, the said defendants confessed a judgment in the Floyd…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mayer v. Farmers' BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Morrison v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Equitable Life Insurance v. RoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Hamilton v. HendersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Lackender v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API