Legal Opinion

Magen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 14, 1928No. 211PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAugustus N. Hand, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The substance of the errors assigned is that:(1) No proper allegation of the appointment of the special commissioner is found in the indictment; no such person as a special commissioner could be appointed to conduct a hearing under section 21a of the Bankrupt*328ey Act (11 USCA § 44), and he never took an oath to perform his duties.(2) The indictment is bad for duplicity.(3) The government failed to prove the offense charged, and especially failed to prove some of the assignments of perjury alleged.(4) The remarks of the trial court were such as to deprive the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Seaman v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  4. United States v. LibermanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1910
  5. In re NankinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. United States v. RedfieldDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1961
  3. United States v. StoehrDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Butler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  5. Garber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API