President of the Veazie Bank v. Young
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Oh Exceptions from JSTisi Prius, Appleton, C. J., presiding. Appeal from the decree of the Judge of Probate for the county of Penobscot. The presiding Judge ruled that the Probate Court had jurisdiction, and that the appellant was not a party aggrieved and had no right of appeal, and affirmed the decree of the Judge of Probate appointing an administrator; and the appellant alleged exceptions.
Read the full summary
Oh Exceptions from JSTisi Prius, Appleton, C. J., presiding. Appeal from the decree of the Judge of Probate for the county of Penobscot. The presiding Judge ruled that the Probate Court had jurisdiction, and that the appellant was not a party aggrieved and had no right of appeal, and affirmed the decree of the Judge of Probate appointing an administrator; and the appellant alleged exceptions. The remaining facts appear in the opinion. contended,— That the bank rests its right of appeal upon the fact that it is a party defendant, in the suit now pending in this Court. Atlcinson v. J. P. Veazie…
1Opinion of the CourtBarrows, J.
In December, 1857, an action was commenced in the name of one Amos Atkinson of Brookline, Massachusetts, against Jones P. Veazie, in the S. J. Court in this county, wherein such proceedings were afterwards had that judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the summer of 1859, for debt and costs, upon which *558judgment a suit was almost immediately instituted, in which the President, Directors and Company of the Yeazie Bank were summoned as trustees. Protracted litigation between the plaintiff and the alleged trustees ensued, pending which Amos Atkinson died. The Judge of Probate for…
2Cited by4 opinions
- McMahan v. RubleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Worthen v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
- Randol v. GaroutteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
- Gannon v. DoyleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1890