Thomson v. Peake
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Hudson, J., Hnion, October, 1891. Action by the children of Jessie M. Thomson against Glenn D. Peake, trustee, and Jessie M. Thomson. The master’s findings were as follows: Conclusions of Law: I. That W. Waddy Thomson took under his father’s said will a fee defensible in Beauty Spot plantation, subject to be defeated upon his dying without heir or heirs of his body. II.
Read the full summary
Before Hudson, J., Hnion, October, 1891. Action by the children of Jessie M. Thomson against Glenn D. Peake, trustee, and Jessie M. Thomson. The master’s findings were as follows: Conclusions of Law: I. That W. Waddy Thomson took under his father’s said will a fee defensible in Beauty Spot plantation, subject to be defeated upon his dying without heir or heirs of his body. II. That by virtue of a sale, under two mortgages, of said plantation, given by him to the late J. S. R. Thomson and Albert G. Means, respectively, to secure the payment of eight hundred and twenty-seven 70-100 dollars to…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Pope.
The children of W. W. Thomson and Jessie, his wife, five in number, by their guardian ad litem, the said W. W. Thomson, have instituted this action against the defendants, Glenn D. Peake, and the said Jessie M. Thomson, to procure an account and settlement of the rents and profits of a certain plantation of land, situated in York County, in this State, known as “Beauty Spot,” containing 693 acres, from January, 1887, during the time when the defendant, Glenn D. Peake, controlled the same, and also for his removal from the office of…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Turbeville v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Thraves v. GreenleesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Hood v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Drummond v. DrummondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928