Cinch Manufacturing Co. v. Rosewell
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoffman
The petitioner, Commonwealth Edison Company (Edison), appeals from the denial of its motion to amend its tax objection pleading. The trial court denied the motion to amend for lack of jurisdiction because it was filed more than 30 days after the entry of a pronouncement order which the court found was final. We consider whether this court has jurisdiction over Edison’s appeal and, for the following reasons, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Edison and Cinch Manufacturing Company (Cinch) filed a petition on February 6, 1980, for the return of personal property taxes paid under…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Flores v. DuganIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Sears v. SearsIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Arachnid, Inc. v. BeallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Ingle v. Hospital Sisters Health SystemAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Enblom v. Milwaukee Golf DevelopmentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paul H. Schwendener, Inc. v. Jupiter Electric Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Thomas Hake Enterprises, Inc. v. BetkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Cinch Manufacturing Co. v. RosewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Schwendener v. Jupiter Electric Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005