Legal Opinion

Trentham v. Bluthenthal & Bickart

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 13, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Judge Candler. Campbell superior court. -August 11, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtFish, P. J.

The rulings above announced dispose of all the points insisted on here by counsel for the plaintiff in error, as well as every question presented by the cross-bill of exceptions upon which we are called on to pass. The headnotes speak for themselves, and it is unnecessary that we should set forth in detail all 'the facts of the case or discuss it at any considerable length. The suit was instituted by Bluthenthal & Bickart to recover a balance alleged to be due upon a promissory note given that firm by Trent-ham. He filed an answer in which he set up the defense, that, upon a full and fair…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. HarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Murphey v. BushSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Holston Box & Lumber Co. v. Vonberg & BatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Stewart v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. National Bauxite Co. v. Republic Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  5. Manry v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API