Farkas ex rel. Estate of Farkas v. Farkas
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TRAGER, District Judge:
Plaintiff Ruth Farkas (“Ruth”) originally brought this claim against defendant Arlene Farkas (“Arlene”), Ruth’s estranged daughter-in-law, for conversion of a number of pieces of art which had resided for many years in the home of Arlene and Bruce, Ruth’s son. Arlene then counterclaimed against Ruth for fraud and conversion of art, money, and other marital assets. Prior to trial, Ruth died. Following a jury verdict in which the jury found that Arlene had converted nothing, and that Ruth had converted art and other property worth $700,000, Bruce, as Ruth’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- General Stencils, Inc. v. ChiappaNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Logan v. Bennington College Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Smith v. CutsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re the Estate of SpewackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by1 opinion
- Farkas v. FarkasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999