Legal Opinion

Chanler v. Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 21, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry Cozier, J.), entered June 30, 1999, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs’ action to recover real estate commissions on a theory of unjust enrichment, not having been commenced within six years of the accrual of the claims, is time-barred (see, CPLR 213 [1]; compare, e.g., Whalen v Gerzof, 76 NY2d 914). Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Lerner, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whalen v. GerzofNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Malmsteen v. BERDON, LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Helfand v. SesslerCivil Court of the City of New York · 2002