Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

D.C. v. School District of Philadelphia

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 2005Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

Judge SIMPSON.

I agree with the majority’s resolution of the Students’ special legislation challenge to Section 2134 of the School Code (Transition Statute).1 However, I respectfully dissent from the conclusions regarding a denial of procedural due process. For the reasons that follow, I would affirm the grant of summary judgment to the School District of Philadelphia.

First, the named Students2 failed to present a factual basis to prevail because they failed to prove any deprivation whatsoever.

By agreement, the case proceeded to summary judgment without any…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. DeFazio v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Dallam v. Cumberland Valley School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. DeFazio v. Civil Service Commission of Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. In the Interest of Ryan Michael C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API