D.C. v. School District of Philadelphia
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by
Judge SIMPSON.
I agree with the majority’s resolution of the Students’ special legislation challenge to Section 2134 of the School Code (Transition Statute).1 However, I respectfully dissent from the conclusions regarding a denial of procedural due process. For the reasons that follow, I would affirm the grant of summary judgment to the School District of Philadelphia.
First, the named Students2 failed to present a factual basis to prevail because they failed to prove any deprivation whatsoever.
By agreement, the case proceeded to summary judgment without any…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- DeFazio v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Dallam v. Cumberland Valley School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- DeFazio v. Civil Service Commission of Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- In the Interest of Ryan Michael C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.