Legal Opinion

People v. Chrysler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Pursuant to the direction of this Court (People v Chrysler, 233 AD2d 928), defendant was assigned new counsel and County Court heard oral argument on the motion of defendant to withdraw his guilty plea. The record of that proceeding establishes that defendant was given a reasonable opportunity to advance his contentions, and we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion (see, People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926, 927; People v Parker, 222 AD2d 1104, lv denied 87 NY2d 1023).

There is no merit to the contention that, during his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. TinsleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. ChryslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. People v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ClacksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. PetersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API