Alford v. Miller
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Bill to redeem, reserved by the superior court for advice. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.
In this case the petitioners seek to redeem a prior mortgage given by Whitfield T. Munson to the Hitclicocksville Savings Bank and Building Association, to secure a note for $400, which note is now the property of Lucina Miller the respondent, and claim that the note was in part paid before she became the owner of it. We are of opinion that it was not so paid, and that the petitioners'can not be permitted to redeem until they pay the full amount of the note.
The finding sufficiently discloses the fact that the affairs of the bank were managed by a board of directors, of which Mun-son, the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Heminway v. HeminwaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Rider v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
- Chicago Building & Manufacturing Co. v. SummerourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- State Ex Rel. Paschall v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Erskine v. PeckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.