Legal Opinion

Burke v. Gotlieb

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1959Published

1Opinion of the CourtCharles Margett, J.

Motion by defendant to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

This is an action on a promissory note. Plaintiff alleges that on or about March 12, 1953, for value received, defendant made and delivered to plaintiff a promissory note; that plaintiff is and always has been the owner and holder of the note; and that *894payment of the note is past due and no part has been paid although duly demanded. A copy of the note is annexed to and made part of the complaint. It appears on the face of the note that payment by the defendant was to be made ‘ ‘…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Prindle v. . CaruthersNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Tooker v. . ArnouxNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Conkling v. GandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  4. Marshall v. RockwoodNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Conti v. Max Cohen, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API