Burke v. Gotlieb
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCharles Margett, J.
Motion by defendant to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
This is an action on a promissory note. Plaintiff alleges that on or about March 12, 1953, for value received, defendant made and delivered to plaintiff a promissory note; that plaintiff is and always has been the owner and holder of the note; and that *894payment of the note is past due and no part has been paid although duly demanded. A copy of the note is annexed to and made part of the complaint. It appears on the face of the note that payment by the defendant was to be made ‘ ‘…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Prindle v. . CaruthersNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Tooker v. . ArnouxNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Conkling v. GandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Marshall v. RockwoodNew York Supreme Court · 1855
- Conti v. Max Cohen, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.