State Ex Rel. Hayes v. Heiser
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Relator’s brief stages the sole question presented is: Did the right to receive a pension become vested in relator by reason of tbe judgment and orders of tbis court on March 24, 1937? If such right did vest, relator then contends tbe pension board bad no authority to do other than was ordered by this court, namely, pay relator a pension of $100 peí* montb.
The demurrer admits all the well pleaded allegations of the answer and searches the entire record. State, ex rel. Deal, v. Industrial Commission, 120 Ohio St.; 269, 166 N. E., 198; 31 Ohio Jurisprudence, 781, Section 202.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mell v. State Ex Rel. FritzOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Hayes v. PfeiferOhio Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pancake v. WakefieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1956