Legal Opinion

Rindahl v. Reisch

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided January 24, 2025No. 4:22-cv-04073Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION RANDY LEE RINDAHL, 4:22-CV-04073-RAL Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S VS. MOTION TO EXTEND AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S RULE 56(d) MOTION AND MOTION TO WAIVE LOCAL RULES TIM REISCH, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; DOUG CLARK, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; DAN SULLIVAN, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; TROY PONTO, DEPUTY WARDEN, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JOHN BENTING, ASSOC. WARDEN, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY; C. ROTERT, EX-ASSOC. WARDEN / CCM, IN HIS OR HER INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY; ELLIS, SECTION…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Insley's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. Bunch v. University of Arkansas Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. CareToLive v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. Robert Bruning v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API