Cobbey v. Dorland
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from, the district court of Gage county. Tried below before Babcock, J. References: German lots. Co. v. Eddy, 36 Neb., 461; German Ins. Co. v. Penrod, 35 Neb., 273; Kansas P. R. Co. v. Timelier, 17 Kan., 101; Smith v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co., 56 la., 720; Ins. Co. of North America v. McLimans, 28 Neb., 657.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
An action was commenced in the district court of Gage county for the plaintiff! by the intervenor, as her attorney, in which it appeared in the petition filed that she, as mortgagee of certain property in Beatrice, was entitled to the amount of the insurance thereon, evidenced by a policy issued by the ¿Etna Insurance Company of defendants, the property having been totally destroyed by fire. The petition in the action was filed of date December 30,1893. Subsequently, pursuant to a settlement of the disputed questions in the case, A. L. Green claiming to represent the plaintiff during such…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sheedy v. McMurtryNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ahalt v. GatewoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Nielsen v. City of Albert LeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904