Crump v. State

On Rehearing.

Appellant’s counsel are, it seems, intensely dissatisfied with our opinion. They are resourceful and acute; and challenge, with citation of authority, just about every ruling implicit in our decision.

But space forbids that we enter into or upon a differentiation of all the cases they cite —the opinions in which, we believe, in every instance, were written by the present author.

In retrospect, it is possible the ruling in Howard v. State, 24 Ala.App. 191, 132 So. 459, upon which they rely so confidently, should have been limited in its. effect to the facts of that particular case.…