Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Williams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1882PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal-from Barbour Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. H. D. ClaytoN. . • • The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. (No briefs came to the hands of the reporter.)

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an, action of trover fqr the conversion by the appellant, Thornton, of seed cotton, alleged to be the property of the appellee, "Williams. The facts may be -briefly stated as follows: In March, 1881, the appellee, Williams, and one Bird entered into a written contract for the cultivation of a piece of land. The appellee was to furnish the land and team, and Bii’d the,labor; the crop to be divided in unequal shares between them. Subsequently Bird became indebted to appellant, Thornton, for advances, for which he. executed his note in the form prescribed by the statute. — Code, 3286. ,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mason v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  2. Dunbar v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Locke v. HumphriesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Westmoreland v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Newell Contracting Co. v. GlennSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Voris v. Star City Building & Loan Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Borden v. King Mill & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Park-Robertson Hardware Co. v. CopelandAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API