Legal Opinion

Sternaman v. Macloskie

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided May 10, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 8423PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on motion of defendant Eugenia B. Macloskie, Executrix of Estate of Charles Wilhelmi Macloskie, [1] to change venue from the Eastern District of South Carolina, Charleston Division, to the Southern District of Georgia, Augusta Division, pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1404[a] 1 on grounds that change of venue would be for the convenience of parties and witnesss and in the interest of justice; and [2] to bring in Beaman Rampey and Interurban Transit Lines, Inc., as cross-defendants pursuant to Rule 13 [h] 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weaver v. MarcusCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  2. Fort Chartres & Ivy Landing Drainage & Levee Dist. No. 5 v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1945
  3. Invest-Import v. Seaboard Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  4. Parker v. Broadcast Music, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  5. Gallimore v. DyeDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Debbis v. Hertz CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1967
  2. Leung v. NunesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. McCormick v. MaysDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
  4. United States Agricultural Processors Marketing Service, Inc. v. Quinonez Hermanos, S.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API