Legal Opinion

Consolidated Coal Co. of St. Louis v. Jones & Adams Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 20, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon County; the Hon. James A. Creighton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Puterbaugh

This is an action in assumpsit by appellant against appellee. Recovery is sought upon a written contract between said parties, the material portions- of which are as follows:

“ Said first party (appellee) agrees and contracts to furnish to said second party (appellant) a minimum of 125 tons per day, and a maximum of 200 tons per day, of mine run or lump coal, from their mine located at Springfield, Illinois, during a period of nine months, commencing July 1, 1902, and ending March 31, 1903, at the following prices, f. o. b. mines: ‘ Lump,’ $.95 per ton; 'mine run,’ $.85 per ton. Shipments of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Osgood v. SkinnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Pope v. HankeIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Schneider v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Consolidated Coal Co. v. SchneiderIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Schlee v. GuckenheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simms v. SullivanOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Dietz v. Nix.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. People ex rel. Hinton v. HeintzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  4. Jones & Adams Co. v. Consolidated Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  5. Palmer v. HumistonOhio Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API