Legal Opinion
Consolidated Coal Co. of St. Louis v. Jones & Adams Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 20, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action in assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon County; the Hon. James A. Creighton, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Puterbaugh
This is an action in assumpsit by appellant against appellee. Recovery is sought upon a written contract between said parties, the material portions- of which are as follows:
“ Said first party (appellee) agrees and contracts to furnish to said second party (appellant) a minimum of 125 tons per day, and a maximum of 200 tons per day, of mine run or lump coal, from their mine located at Springfield, Illinois, during a period of nine months, commencing July 1, 1902, and ending March 31, 1903, at the following prices, f. o. b. mines: ‘ Lump,’ $.95 per ton; 'mine run,’ $.85 per ton. Shipments of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Osgood v. SkinnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Pope v. HankeIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Schneider v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Consolidated Coal Co. v. SchneiderIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Schlee v. GuckenheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Simms v. SullivanOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Dietz v. Nix.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1919
- People ex rel. Hinton v. HeintzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
- Jones & Adams Co. v. Consolidated Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1907
- Palmer v. HumistonOhio Supreme Court · 1913