Legal Opinion
Kitty Hawk Aircargo, Inc. v. Arthur D. Little, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 14, 1996No. Civil Action 94-12081-RCLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LINDSAY, District Judge.
This case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiffs motion is DENIED and the defendant’s motion is GRANTED.
I. Facts
This case involves the bidding process for an air carrier service contract known as “ANET 93-01.” The following basic facts are not disputed. The United States Postal Service (“USPS”), whose business the contract would award, hired Arthur D. Little (“ADL”) to assist in evaluating the bids. Before the bids were submitted, Conrad Kalitta, an affiliate of one of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- ABU NASER HOSSAIN v. JMU PROPERTIES, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Stover v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- US Bank National Association v. Fidelity National Title Group, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Unit Owners Ass'n of 2337 Champlain St. Condo. v. 2337 Champlain St., LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024