Martin v. State

The appellant seeks a reversal of the judgment of the lower court wherein he was found and adjudged guilty of the crime of larceny. The question urged arises upon the evidence, and the appellee objects to any .consideration of the evidence upon the ground that the record does not affirmatively disclose that the bill of exceptions was signed by the trial judge before the same was filed by the clerk. It affirmatively appears from the entries of the court *520that on the 9th day of February, 1897, the appellant filed, during the term, and within the time allowed, the bill of exceptions copied into…