Legal Opinion

Radio Corp. of America v. Lord

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 11, 1928No. 3789PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*259DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court restraining the Radio Corporation of America, hereinafter called the defendant, from enforcing directly or indirectly contracts for the sale of radio vacuum tubes embodied in paragraph 9 of the agreement between the defendant and its licensees, and denying defendant's motion to dismiss the bill for want of indispensable parties.

The plaintiffs are engaged in the manufacture and sale of vacuum tubes, known as audions, which are used in radio receiving sets. The suit was brought under section 16 of the Clayton Act (15…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-Houston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. John E. Thropp's Sons Co. v. SeiberlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  3. Automatic Radio Manufacturing Co. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Tatnall Measuring Systems Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Pick Mfg. Co. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API