State v. Wakefield
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis Criminal Court, Laudhlin, J. Neither the oath nor the allegations of the indictment can be extended by implication.' — The State v. Bailey, 34 Mo. 350; The Stale v. Holden, 48 Mo. 93; The State v. Keel, 44 Mo. 182; The State v. Shanks, 66 Mo. 560; The State v. Painter, 67 Mo. 89. * Ward v. The State, 2' Mo. 120; The Statev. Terry, 30 Mo. 371; 9 Mo. 837, 838 ; 16 Iowa, 40.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.
The indictment alleges that at the time mentioned, and at the Criminal Court of the City of St. Louis, the grand jurors of the city of St. Louis aforesaid, “ having been duly sworn to examine and inquire into all matters and things that should come to their knowledge, a certain inquiry, examination, and investigation was then and there being had and made as to whether any member of the board of police commissioners of the city of St. Louis, in the State aforesaid, * * * on the first day of May, a. d. 1878, and on divers other days and times between that day and the fifteenth day of April, A.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. KeelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- State v. HoldenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- State v. SleeperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
- State v. ShanksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- People v. BurroughsNew York Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- State v. AckermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908