Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Twist v. Twist

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 26, 1953No. 4-9822Published

1ConcurrenceEd. F. McFaddin, Justice

I concur with the result reached in this case, but I reach such result by a process of reasoning entirely different from that contained in the majority opinion.

It is my view: (a) that Ira Twist was the trustee for the C. C. Twist family; (b) that Mrs. J. Frank Twist was trustee for the J. Frank Twist family; and (c) that the two families dealt at arm’s length. My conclusion is that Ira Twist was not a trustee for the J. Frank Twist family, and, therefore, could not have violated any trust obligations to the J. Frank Twist family, since he was not a trustee for that family.

The present case is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Twist v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API