Legal Opinion

Stippich v. Morrison

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1961PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The rationale of the learned trial court’s determination, that the complaint should be dismissed as to Great American, was that Morrison had breached a condition of the policy thereby terminating coverage.

The condition of the policy, which it was determined that Morrison had breached, reads as follows:

“If claim is made or suit is brought against the insured, he shall immediately forward to the company every demand, notice, summons, or other process received by him or his representative.”

Such quoted condition was breached by Morrison’s not forwarding promptly to Great American the summons,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kurz v. CollinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Heimlich v. Kees Appliance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Billington v. Interinsurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Schneck v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Thompson v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Fox Ex Rel. Fox v. National Savings Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Foote v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API